Auren Replay
Prove the value before Auren moves a dollar.
Replay reconstructs historical financial decisions, evaluates the alternatives that were available under the same constraints, and measures where a different eligible action could have improved the economic outcome.
Counterfactual Analysis
What happened versus what could have happened.
Replay turns past execution into evidence. The goal is not another payment report; it is a defensible record of the decision itself.
INGEST
Ingest historical activity
Use completed financial activity, account context, obligations, and available policy evidence as the basis for analysis.
RECONSTRUCT
Reconstruct the decision
Identify the objective, timing, funding source, constraints, and execution path that actually occurred.
COMPARE
Evaluate alternatives
Model the eligible alternatives Auren could have considered under the same business constraints.
MEASURE
Measure the difference
Compare actual execution with the Auren counterfactual across cost, liquidity, timing, and policy adherence.
Illustrative Replay
A decision trail a CFO can interrogate.
An Auren Replay should show the business objective, the financial state at the time, the policy constraints, the alternatives that were available, why options were rejected, and the modeled difference between the actual action and the best eligible alternative.
PERSISTENT INTENT
Pay Acme $125,000 today while maintaining at least $500,000 in operating liquidity.
Replay status
Decision reconstructed
STATE + POLICY
Obligation
$125,000
Deadline
Today
Liquidity floor
$500,000
Policy checks
3 active
Actual execution
Existing Provider
Total cost
$42.00
Settlement
Same day
AUREN COUNTERFACTUAL
Reserve Account → Best Eligible Provider
Operating Account
Rejected
Would breach $500K modeled liquidity floor
Reserve Account
Eligible
Meets timing and liquidity requirements
Secondary Provider
Eligible
Higher modeled total execution cost
Deferred execution
Rejected
Misses obligation deadline
Expected cost
$18.50
Modeled difference
$23.50 lower
Liquidity floor
Preserved
Executive finding
A better eligible action existed.
The counterfactual met the stated deadline, preserved the modeled operating-liquidity floor, passed the reconstructed policy checks, and produced a lower modeled execution cost than the historical action.
Illustrative product example. Values shown are hypothetical and are not customer results.
What Replay Produces
Evidence before authority.
DECISIONS
A reconstructed record of historical financial intent, state, constraints, and execution.
ALTERNATIVES
A view of eligible and rejected alternatives, including the reason an option failed policy or objective constraints.
ECONOMICS
A modeled comparison across cost, liquidity, timing, and other available execution factors.
PROOF
An auditable explanation of what Auren would have recommended and why.
Design Partner Program
Start with your own history.
The first conversation is about your current execution complexity, the historical data available, and whether Replay can produce a useful and defensible counterfactual.